Voici le corrigé interaction orale des onze exercices. Pour les questions ouvertes, plusieurs réponses sont possibles : celles qui sont proposées servent de modèles à adapter. Lisez-les à voix haute pour en mémoriser la mélodie.
La correction détaillée
Le corrigé interaction orale, réplique par réplique
Correction de l’exercice 1 : Quelle fonction ?- B – garder la parole
- C – demander une précision
- A – interrompre
- D – reformuler
- E – concéder
- F – relancer
- H – refuser un point of information
- G – donner la parole
- Sorry, could you say that again, please?
- Sorry to interrupt, but could I come in here?
- I’m afraid I don’t quite agree with you.
- I’m not sure that idea would work, because…
- If I could just finish my point, please.
- Sorry, I’m not sure I follow you. What do you mean exactly?
- So what you’re saying is that phones are damaging young people’s social skills.
- In other words, higher fuel prices would make people drive less.
- So what you’re saying is that keeping animals in captivity is wrong, even in good conditions.
- In other words, teenagers’ body clocks don’t match the school timetable.
- So what you’re saying is that tourism helps the economy but makes housing unaffordable for locals.
- isn’t it (be au présent, phrase affirmative)
- do you (phrase négative → tag affirmatif)
- hasn’t it (present perfect : auxiliaire have)
- will they
- shouldn’t we
- can she
- shall we (tag fixe après Let’s)
- didn’t you (prétérit : auxiliaire did)
- Why do you think so? Does it never help you to understand a lesson?
- In what way? Could you give an example?
- What would be the main benefit: health or the environment?
- Which games are you thinking of, and what do they teach?
- How exactly do they make schools fairer?
- What would you suggest instead?
- I take your point that some shops might suffer at first, but pedestrian streets usually attract more shoppers in the long run.
- That’s a fair point; however, several trials have shown that rested staff work more efficiently.
- Admittedly, uniforms cost money, yet they are often cheaper than buying fashionable clothes all year round.
- I see what you mean, but for many shy teenagers, online friends offer real support.
- You may be right that one person’s effort is small, but millions of small efforts add up.
- Some may not be, but the climate marches show that many young people care deeply about political issues.
- isn’t it
- Sorry to interrupt
- If I could just finish
- What exactly do you mean
- In other words
- That’s a fair point
- Let’s not lose sight of
- Would you like to add something
- motion
- chair
- proposition
- opposition
- point of information
- closing speech
- You’re right, it’s a good idea.
- I agree with Tom.
- You can come tomorrow, can’t you? (le tag reprend l’auxiliaire can)
- Sorry, you’ve been speaking for ten minutes. (present perfect + for ; Sorry quand on interrompt)
- What do you mean by “freedom”?
- I don’t agree, because I don’t think it’s true. (ou : I disagree, because…)
- Sorry to interrupt, but can I come in here?
- If I’ve understood correctly, you’re against this law.
- That’s a fair point, but it doesn’t solve the problem.
- Could you give an example?
- Let me finish, please. (ou : If I could just finish, please.)
- The real question is who will pay.
- Madam Chair, members of the House, we believe that city centres belong to people, not to cars.
- Argument 1 : health. Air pollution from traffic damages children’s lungs; after cars were restricted in some European city centres, pollution levels fell. Argument 2 : quality of life. Car-free streets are quieter and safer, and families can use them as public spaces again.
- Objection 1 : local shops will lose customers. Objection 2 : elderly and disabled people will be cut off.
- Response 1 : I take your point, but people on foot visit shops more often and stay longer. Response 2 : That’s a fair concern; however, our plan includes free shuttles and access for disabled drivers.
- Point of information : Could the opposition tell us how many lives they are willing to trade for a parking space?
Exemple d’échange modèle :
Proposition: Traffic fumes are one of the main sources of urban air pollution, aren’t they? Removing cars from the centre is the fastest way to protect our lungs.
Opposition: Sorry to interrupt, but what about people who live on the outskirts and need their cars to get to work?
Proposition: That’s a fair point. However, the motion doesn’t ban cars from the city, only from the centre. Park-and-ride car parks and better buses would solve that problem.
Opposition: So what you’re saying is that taxpayers should pay for all these new buses?
Proposition: In part, yes, but cleaner air would also save money in healthcare. Let’s not lose sight of what matters most: people’s health.
Comment progresser après ce corrigé
Apprenez par cœur une formule par fonction (interrompre, garder la parole, reformuler, concéder) plutôt que dix formules approximatives : à l’oral, c’est la formule disponible immédiatement qui compte. Entraînez-vous ensuite à deux sur des motions simples, en vous imposant d’utiliser au moins une reformulation et une concession à chaque échange.

